MMasters in Business
← All episodes
25 June 2025

At The Money: Navigating War, Tariffs and Geopolitics

2Frameworks
8Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster06:51

Why Elevated Uncertainty Does Not Make High Stock Prices Irrational

The discussion challenges the claim that markets should not be high when uncertainty is elevated. Uncertainty is presented as an inherent feature of equity investing and part of why stocks can offer returns above assets with more certain cash flows.

  • Uncertainty is structural, not an unusual market defect
  • Eliminating uncertainty would also reduce prospective reward
  • Treasuries offer a more certain alternative with a different return profile

“Well, uncertainty just defines the nature of investing in the stock market. Right, if there was no uncertainty, you wouldn't get a great return.”

Sam Row · 07:07

“Right if you want, if you want certain returns, you can get four point something on the ten year treasury.”

Barry Ritholtz · 07:15
#uncertainty#equities#risk premium#treasuries

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take07:54

The Market Force Stronger Than Geopolitical Tension

Row argues that the persistent drive for better technology, lower costs, faster processes, and improved living standards is more powerful over time than intermittent geopolitical flare-ups. Those forces support productivity, employment, earnings, and profits even as conflicts periodically disrupt markets.

  • Businesses continually pursue better and cheaper technologies
  • Productivity and profit growth persist through geopolitical disruptions
  • Geopolitical flare-ups matter but are not necessarily the dominant long-term force
  • Human demand for improvement supports economic resilience

“if there's a more powerful force than geopolitical tensions, it's going to be everyone's desire to want things to be better.”

Sam Row · 08:08

“that force that's driving earnings and profits and productivity and the economy and employment and quality of life, standards of living and all this stuff,…”

Sam Row · 08:26
#productivity#technology#earnings#economic growth
Hot Take11:29

Tariffs May Move Factories From China—But Not Back to America

Row expects only marginal reshoring because alternative manufacturing locations remain cheaper than the United States. Production is more likely to shift from China to Vietnam, Mexico, Indonesia, or similar markets, and any new US factories will increasingly rely on automation rather than large workforces.

  • Some reshoring may occur at the margin
  • Manufacturing is likely to migrate to lower-cost countries outside China
  • US-based production remains comparatively expensive
  • Automation limits the number of factory jobs reshoring can restore

“in every way it's going to be No, We're not going to have a ton of home shoring.”

Sam Row · 12:01

“You're gonna move to Vietnam, You're gonna move to Mexico, You're gonna move to Indonesia and all these other places where it might be more…”

Sam Row · 12:28
#tariffs#reshoring#manufacturing#automation

Explainer· 3

Explainer01:42

How Quickly Markets Have Historically Absorbed Geopolitical Shocks

Sam Row cites a Deutsche Bank review of roughly 30 geopolitical events across a century. The reported average and median interval from the triggering event to the S&P 500 bottom was about 15 trading days, although later discussion emphasizes that outcomes vary widely.

  • Historical market hits from geopolitical events have often been brief
  • The cited review covered about 30 events over 100 years
  • The average and median time to the market bottom was about 15 trading days
  • Historical averages do not guarantee the next recovery timetable

“from the beginning of the event that triggered, you know, the conflict to the bottom of the S and B five hundred on average, and…”

Sam Row · 03:48

“Fifteen trading days, essentially three weeks.”

Sam Row · 03:58
#geopolitics#market history#volatility#s&p 500
Explainer08:52

Why Middle East Oil Shocks Hit Households Less Than in the 1970s

Energy spending has fallen sharply as a share of household consumption, while vehicles, appliances, heating systems, hybrids, and electric vehicles have become more efficient. This makes modern oil disruptions less directly inflationary than those of the late 1970s, though visible gasoline-price jumps can still damage consumer confidence.

  • Energy was about 10% of personal consumption spending in the late 1970s and early 1980s
  • The share is now closer to 3%–4%
  • Fuel economy and appliance efficiency reduce household exposure
  • Gasoline-price spikes retain a strong psychological effect

“about ten percent in the late seventies, early eighties, and that's that steadily been declining and now it's closer to somewhere between three and four…”

Sam Row · 10:02

“But when you see gas prices go from two fifty to three twenty five in a very short period of time. That affects you because…”

Sam Row · 11:18
#oil#inflation#energy efficiency#consumer spending
Explainer12:43

AI Automation Is Already Moving Beyond the Factory Floor

The automation debate is no longer confined to manufacturing machinery and robots. Row notes that AI also removes steps from service and knowledge work, including marketing strategy and banking workflows built around meetings and spreadsheets.

  • Automation already affects manufacturing
  • AI also changes service-sector and office work
  • Marketing and banking workflows can lose intermediate tasks
  • Limiting robots would not address the broader spread of AI

“AI has gotten to the point where it's not just affecting the assembly line. It's affecting people who go into an office and you know,…”

Sam Row · 13:13

“if they work in banking, you know, suddenly you can cut a couple steps out of you know, putting numbers into an Excel spreadsheet.”

Sam Row · 13:26
#artificial intelligence#automation#future of work#services

Story· 1

Story15:14

Deepwater Horizon Shows How Memory Compresses Long Crises

Row recalls that the Deepwater Horizon well spewed oil for roughly three months before it was capped, followed by additional time before it was officially sealed. The episode illustrates how memory compresses a prolonged, seemingly endless emergency into a single distant event.

  • The spill continued for about three months before capping
  • Official sealing took additional months
  • People remember past crises as shorter and cleaner than they felt
  • Real-time duration intensifies fear and exhaustion

“It's insane how long this went on.”

Sam Row · 15:55

“But when you're in the moment in the humans live in the here and now, and when it's happening, especially day after day after day.”

Barry Ritholtz · 16:10
#deepwater horizon#crisis memory#bp#risk perception

Takeaway· 1

Takeaway17:13

Market Resilience Can Coexist With Recognition of Human Tragedy

The speakers stress that economic and market resilience should not be used to minimize deaths, war, or psychological suffering. COVID felt like an inescapable science-fiction crisis and killed millions, yet the economy and stock market later reached new highs, demonstrating the dual perspective investors must hold.

  • COVID appeared to threaten permanent social and economic change
  • Scientific progress enabled vaccination and containment
  • The human death toll remained immense
  • Recognizing market recovery does not diminish human suffering

“We were literally living a science fiction movie”

Barry Ritholtz · 17:20

“and yet this, you know, the economy has never been stronger and the stock market has never been higher.”

Sam Row · 17:43
#covid-19#market resilience#human suffering#economic recovery