Whole Capital Structure View
Combine signals across every security tied to a company before judging a move.
- Difficulty
- Advanced
- Time to result
- ~months to results
- Steps
- 6
- Confidence
- 94%
The model treats a company’s equity, preferred stock, convertibles, and corporate bonds as interconnected claims on one capital structure. Each market contains different participants, incentives, and information, so a sharp move in one instrument should be checked against the others before it is interpreted as a fundamental event. Cohn operationalized this at Goldman by combining previously separated equity and corporate-credit teams and encouraging them to discuss companies rather than isolated products. If an equity sells off while the bonds show no deterioration, the combined view may suggest a position liquidation rather than worsening credit fundamentals. The resulting output is a more informed decision about whether to provide liquidity, sell risk, recruit buyers, or hedge elsewhere in the structure.
Origin
Gary Cohn described integrating Goldman Sachs equity and corporate-bond teams into a securities division so specialists could analyze companies across their full capital structures. Extracted from Masters in Business.
Core principles
- 01A company event affects more than its common stock.
- 02Equity and credit desks observe different parts of the same underlying risk.
- 03Physical and organizational proximity improves signal sharing.
- 04Relative moves across securities help distinguish fundamentals from liquidation.
- 05Risk decisions should reflect the company’s complete financing structure.
How to run it
- 1
Map the claims
List the company’s common equity, preferred shares, convertibles, corporate bonds, and other material financing instruments. Note their seniority and economic relationships.
Pro tip Include derivatives when they reveal significant positioning or hedging demand.
Watch out A missing layer can conceal where informed investors are expressing concern.
- 2
Gather specialist signals
Ask the teams or data sources closest to each instrument what they are seeing in price, flow, liquidity, and client behavior. Preserve differences rather than forcing premature consensus.
Pro tip Frame the discussion around the company name, not the product category.
Watch out Product silos can mistake local order flow for a company-wide event.
- 3
Compare cross-market behavior
Check whether equities, bonds, preferreds, and convertibles are confirming or contradicting one another. Look for changes in spreads, implied volatility, and liquidity alongside the headline price move.
Pro tip Pay particular attention when a junior security moves sharply but senior claims remain stable.
Watch out Cross-market divergence is a clue, not automatic proof of mispricing.
- 4
Classify the driver
Decide whether the evidence points to changed fundamentals, forced liquidation, technical flow, financing stress, or another cause. Seek additional confirmation when the structure sends mixed signals.
Pro tip Ask what each hypothesized cause should look like in every layer of the structure.
Watch out Do not assume that no bond move means no problem; some markets adjust more slowly.
- 5
Select the response
Use the integrated diagnosis to decide whether to sell, buy, facilitate client flow, hedge in another instrument, or wait. Size the response according to both conviction and liquidity.
Pro tip Express the view in the instrument offering the clearest risk-reward trade-off.
Watch out A correct company view can still lose money if expressed through an illiquid or poorly hedged security.
- 6
Keep the intelligence connected
Create recurring communication between teams covering different claims on the same issuers. Review major company events through the full structure rather than only during crises.
Pro tip Co-locate teams or establish company-centered channels and reviews.
Watch out One-time integration will decay if incentives and routines remain product-specific.
In the wild
Cohn recalled seeing a stock sell off hard and calling the corporate-bond desk, which reported nothing unusual in the name. That divergence prompted a different question: whether a large holder was liquidating rather than whether the company’s fundamentals had deteriorated. The firm could then consider finding buyers instead of reflexively selling alongside the move.
→ Cross-market evidence reframed a frightening price move as a possible flow event and improved the response options.
Common mistakes
Analyzing only the stock
Equity price action provides one perspective on a company but may be dominated by positioning or liquidity rather than a fundamental change.
Separating teams by product
When equity and credit specialists sit in different organizational silos, useful company-level intelligence may never be combined.
Treating divergence as certainty
Contradictory signals should trigger investigation, not an automatic contrarian trade, because markets can differ in speed and liquidity.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for institutional investors, traders, and risk teams analyzing companies with multiple actively traded securities.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal for simple businesses with no meaningful debt or alternative securities and little cross-market information.
From the transcript
“We have to learn by the whole capital structure, because it is a capital structure.”
“if you got something going on in company X, it's not just affecting the equity. It's affecting the converts, it's affecting the preferreds, it's affecting…”
“And those traders. When we started, they were in different buildings. They didn't even know who they were, and so should we put them all…”
From the episode
Gary Cohn Says Fed Should Be Done Raising Rates
Gary Cohn