MMasters in Business
← All frameworks
FinanceSongyee Yoon

AI-Native Investment Screen

Test necessity, user value, defensibility, durability, and adaptability

Difficulty
Advanced
Time to result
~weeks to results
Steps
6
Confidence
97%

The screen begins with necessity: remove AI conceptually and ask whether the company can still deliver essentially the same product. If it can, the technology may be decorative rather than foundational. Next, evaluate the real value created for end users instead of rewarding an impressive demonstration or isolated feature. For infrastructure, examine whether the technology can support many future applications as platforms evolve. For vertical businesses, inspect access to customer and operational data, the company's ability to build unique technology on that data, and whether usage creates a compounding flywheel. Finally, assess durability under changing models, architectures, regulations, and geopolitics. Strong candidates combine indispensable technology, genuine customer outcomes, founder insight, accumulating defensibility, and enough organizational flexibility to survive a decade of change.

Origin

Extracted from Masters in Business through Songyee Yoon's explanations of how Principal Venture Partners evaluates AI-native infrastructure and application companies.

Core principles

  • 01AI must be indispensable to the business rather than decorative
  • 02End-user value matters more than impressive demonstrations
  • 03Foundational infrastructure should serve multiple future applications
  • 04Proprietary data access can compound into a defensible moat
  • 05Long-duration investments must withstand technical and policy change

How to run it

  1. 1

    Run the removal test

    Imagine removing AI from the product and operating model. Determine whether the same value could be delivered with conventional software or analytics.

    Pro tip Ask directly why AI is indispensable rather than merely useful.

    Watch out Agent terminology does not prove that an application needs an agent.

  2. 2

    Verify end-user value

    Identify the real problem solved and the measurable improvement experienced by the customer. Separate a compelling demonstration from a sustainable business outcome.

    Pro tip Ask what becomes more efficient, effective, accessible, or newly possible.

    Watch out Do not equate technical novelty with customer demand.

  3. 3

    Inspect native design

    Assess whether the technology shapes the company's workflow, organizational design, staffing, and product architecture. Examine whether the founders understand both its capabilities and limitations.

    Pro tip Compare the organization with a company built on the prior technology stack.

    Watch out Adding an AI feature to an unchanged business does not make it AI-native.

  4. 4

    Evaluate platform breadth

    For infrastructure companies, determine whether the foundational technology can serve multiple applications as models and platforms evolve. Favor capabilities that remain useful across changing product categories.

    Pro tip Map several credible downstream uses rather than relying on one current trend.

    Watch out A single fashionable use case can disappear as architectures change.

  5. 5

    Trace the data flywheel

    For vertical applications, identify lawful and appropriate access to customer or operational data. Verify that continued use improves unique technology and strengthens the product's competitive position.

    Pro tip Describe explicitly how each unit of use produces better data, decisions, or performance.

    Watch out Data volume alone is not a moat if competitors can access equivalent information.

  6. 6

    Pressure-test durability

    Model significant changes in technical architecture, policy, litigation, and geopolitics. Determine whether the company can adapt while preserving customer value and defensibility.

    Pro tip Evaluate investments against a decade-long holding period.

    Watch out Do not treat today's dominant models or rules as permanent.

In the wild

Infrastructure investments built for multiple uses

Yoon highlighted Together and Cartesia as companies led by strong founders building foundational technology intended for use across many future AI platform companies. Their appeal was not limited to a single application available at the time of investment.

→ The investments aligned with a thesis favoring infrastructure that can remain useful as the platform evolves.

Sesame's focused voice experience

Yoon's gaming experience taught her the importance of individual features in shaping user experience. She believed Sesame's founders understood which aspects of voice technology mattered and had concentrated their capabilities on advancing those aspects.

→ Founder insight and focused technical execution supported the decision to invest.

A vertical application with compounding data

A hypothetical AI-native logistics company begins with authorized operational data from customers. Each deployment improves its ability to predict delays and recommend interventions, while its workflow is designed around those predictions rather than adding them to a conventional dashboard.

→ Customer usage improves the product and compounds into a defensible operational data advantage.

Common mistakes

Backing an AI demonstration

An impressive technical feature may have no durable end-user value, repeatable demand, or viable business model.

Mistaking analytics for AI necessity

Some purported agent applications could solve the same problem with conventional data analytics, making their AI positioning superficial.

Assuming today's stack is permanent

Models, architectures, and regulations can change substantially during a venture investment's life, so rigidity creates long-term risk.

Is it for you?

Best for

It is best for evaluating early-stage AI infrastructure companies and vertical applications during rapid technological change.

Not ideal for

It is not ideal as a standalone valuation method or a substitute for financial, legal, and market due diligence.

From the transcript

“can you do the same thing without AI? Like why do you need it? Why is it dispensable?”

Songyee Yoon · 35:58

“I always try to ask what is the real value that is going to bring to the end users”

Songyee Yoon · 42:38

“the ones who have appropriate access to data, the data, understanding customers and consumers and the business and build a technology, unique technology on top…”

Songyee Yoon · 32:07

From the episode

Investing for the AI Shift: Masters in Business with Songyee Yoon

Songyee Yoon

→