Why Growth and Value Are Not Opposites
Romick rejects rigid style boxes because a rapidly growing company can still be undervalued relative to its future earnings. He defines value investing through price, business quality, and margin of safety rather than low accounting multiples alone.
- Growth investments can also represent value
- A high current multiple may compress rapidly through growth
- Traditional asset-based protection can prove illusory
- Modern margins of safety often come from business quality
- Technological disruption weakened many classic value cases
“we don't make a great distinction between growth and value.”
“to us, value investing is just to invest with an appropriate margin of safety, buying a business or an asset at a discount.”