Why Skepticism About Impact Investing Creates an Arbitrage
Cone argues that widespread disbelief in impact investing keeps competitors away from promising companies. That skepticism can produce better access and valuations for an investor willing to underwrite both impact and commercial performance.
- Impact branding discourages competing venture investors
- Less competition can improve entry valuations
- Cone describes disbelief as an invisibility cloak
- Her return-focused limited partners validate the commercial thesis
“I started my own fund because I see this incredible arbitrage opportunity and earliest stage impact investing”
“I realized that this is actually my competitive advantage because it means that there's a ton of open ice here because no one else is,…”