Style Boxes Can Protect Asset Growth While Hurting Investment Returns
McLemore argues that rigid growth and value classifications constrain a manager’s ability to pursue the best opportunities across market cycles. Such flexibility may make institutional fundraising harder, but she prefers stronger returns for fewer clients over mediocre results for a larger asset base.
- Investment constraints reduce portfolio flexibility
- Different styles lead during different market regimes
- Institutional selection systems can penalize flexible managers
- Asset gathering and return generation are not always aligned
“When you when you start putting in constraints, um, obviously that hinders your ability to optimize because they hurt your flexibility.”
“we'd rather produced excellent returns for fewer clients than mediocre returns for many.”