MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Safi Bahcall17 January 2020

Safi Bahcall on Why You Need to Take Crazy Risks

5Frameworks
12Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster46:48

The Moses Trap: Great Leaders Do Not Personally Anoint Every Winner

Bahcall rejects the image of the visionary leader standing above the organization and selecting its sacred project. Leaders who repeatedly trust their own product judgment can scale their bets until one selection becomes disastrous, as happened to celebrated innovators and dominant firms.

  • Past product success can produce dangerous confidence
  • Executive selection concentrates innovation risk in one person's judgment
  • Edwin Land, Pan Am, Kodak, and Jobs's early career illustrate the trap
  • Kodak invented the digital camera but protected film sales
  • Leadership systems matter more than heroic product selection

“And that's a complete myth.”

Safi Bahcall · 47:13

“eventually that cycle, that wheel turns one too many times and it's a disaster.”

Safi Bahcall · 47:27
#leadership#innovation#decision-making#moses-trap

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take14:09

Cancer Medicine Is Only at the Start of Its Exponential Curve

Bahcall argues that genome sequencing, laboratory protein production, and biotechnology tools have placed cancer research at the beginning of a steep improvement curve. Progress differs sharply among hundreds of cancer types, but melanoma and some blood cancers demonstrate how rapidly outcomes can change.

  • Cancer is hundreds of biologically distinct diseases
  • Childhood leukemia outcomes improved dramatically
  • Melanoma shifted after immune-based treatments began working
  • Modern biotechnology created tools that did not exist decades earlier
  • Future cures are likely to arrive cancer by cancer rather than all at once

“We're at the beginning of the exponential curve.”

Safi Bahcall · 17:12

“It's really just the beginning of using those amazing tools”

Safi Bahcall · 17:32
#cancer#biotechnology#immunotherapy#genomics
Hot Take1:23:52

Medical Breakthroughs Could Also Strengthen Authoritarian Regimes

Bahcall is optimistic about organ growth, neural interfaces, and the accelerating pace of medicine, but fears that AI and bioengineering can be weaponized. Unlike earlier technologies, these tools may help authoritarian governments suppress opposition and preserve power for longer.

  • Researchers are beginning to print blood vessels onto proto-organs
  • Neural interfaces may restore sight or hearing
  • AI and bioengineering can serve both medical and coercive purposes
  • Authoritarian states face fewer ethical constraints on deployment
  • New surveillance and control tools may prolong repressive governments

“It's just incredible the pace of science and medicine and where we might be ten twenty fifty years from now.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:24:35

“we are creating these new technologies which can actually help keep totalitarian regimes in power longer.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:25:17
#medicine#ai#bioengineering#authoritarianism

Explainer· 4

Explainer11:50

Why Cancer Often Requires Several Attacks at Once

Bahcall compares combination cancer therapy to surrounding an adaptive enemy from several directions. Because cancer cells can evade a single intervention, successful cures have often required the right combination of treatments delivered at the right time.

  • Cancer can adapt around a single therapeutic obstacle
  • Multiple cellular growth-control systems must fail before cancer develops
  • Combination therapies attack different vulnerabilities simultaneously
  • Some successfully treated cancers rely on coordinated shock attacks
  • Timing and composition of the combination both matter

“You need to come at it from all directions at the same time, and then you have a chance.”

Safi Bahcall · 13:42

“it's the right combination at the right time that can actually overwhelm the cancer and wipe it out.”

Safi Bahcall · 14:03
#cancer#medicine#combination-therapy
Explainer32:53

Why Growing Companies Suddenly Replace Projects with Politics

Bahcall models organizations as systems that can shift between fluid and rigid phases even when their people remain unchanged. As team size grows, individual stakes in project outcomes shrink while the rewards of rank increase, moving attention from collective innovation toward internal politics.

  • The same people can behave differently under different organizational incentives
  • Small teams give each member a large stake in project success
  • Large organizations increase the relative value of rank and promotion
  • Company size can trigger a phase transition in behavior
  • Incentive equations can help leaders anticipate and manage the shift

“Today conversations in the hallway are about politics.”

Safi Bahcall · 35:11

“The glass of water has gone from liquid to solid.”

Safi Bahcall · 35:20
#organizations#incentives#scale#culture
Explainer50:58

Why Markets Alone Could Not Have Created the Biotech Industry

Bahcall argues that long-horizon national research investment solves a coordination problem no single company can justify economically. Institutions inspired by Vannevar Bush supported foundational technologies such as biotechnology, GPS, the internet, transistors, and integrated circuits, contributing substantially to postwar growth.

  • Foundational research may benefit society without rewarding one funder
  • National laboratories address this market and game-theory failure
  • Public research helped create several major modern industries
  • Postwar research infrastructure became a US competitive advantage
  • Bahcall warns that US investment is declining while rivals increase theirs

“No one, no one company could have invested to create the biotech industry decades long.”

Safi Bahcall · 52:26

“it's not good for anyone participant but it's good for everyone as a whole.”

Safi Bahcall · 52:35
#research#public-investment#economics#technology
Explainer54:47

How Europe's Fragmentation Helped Launch the Scientific Revolution

For centuries, China, India, and the Islamic world led science, technology, and economic production while Western Europe lagged. Bahcall argues that Europe's many competing states gave rejected thinkers alternative patrons, allowing ideas such as heliocentrism and elliptical planetary motion to survive institutional rejection and help democratize the search for truth.

  • China, India, and Islamic civilizations dominated early science and technology
  • Large empires excelled at vast established projects
  • Central rulers could suppress an unconventional theory across an empire
  • Europe's fragmented states let researchers seek support elsewhere
  • Kepler's findings helped shift authority from doctrine toward measurement and experiment

“Western Europe was like the tiny teeming market of biotechs.”

Safi Bahcall · 58:08

“It was the beginning of the democratization of truth and that transformed our species”

Safi Bahcall · 1:01:03
#scientific-revolution#history#europe#innovation

Story· 3

Story02:00

How a Theoretical Physicist Found His Way into Biotechnology

Bahcall describes leaving an academic environment after becoming curious about how the wider working world operated. Consulting taught him business skills, while illness among friends and family motivated him to build something that could give people more time with loved ones.

  • His transition began as a self-described random walk
  • McKinsey served as a bridge from academia to business
  • Healthcare offered a mission larger than papers or personal advancement
  • Physics helped him communicate neutrally across scientific disciplines
  • He found a niche translating between researchers and financiers

“how motivating would it be if when I woke up in the morning, I was working in something that could give people on Earth more…”

Safi Bahcall · 04:35

“As a physicist, you're sort of like Switzerland, your neutral”

Safi Bahcall · 05:47
#career#biotech#physics#purpose
Story40:34

The Radar Deployment That Broke Hitler's U-Boat Campaign

Microwave radar developed through Vannevar Bush's wartime science organization allowed Allied aircraft to detect small U-boat signatures in the Atlantic. In a matter of weeks, German submarine losses surged, supply lanes to Britain reopened, and the conditions for an Allied invasion of Europe emerged.

  • Britain was nearing a critical shortage of oil and war supplies
  • U-boats had been sinking ships faster than the Allies could replace them
  • Microwave radar let aircraft detect exposed submarine periscopes
  • Hitler lost a third of the U-boat fleet in roughly four weeks
  • The cleared Atlantic lanes enabled Britain to be resupplied

“Hitler lost one third of his entire U boat fleet in that four week period, more than in any other year of the war.”

Safi Bahcall · 42:20
#world-war-two#radar#innovation#military-history
Story1:06:28

The Ten-Minute Pitch That Mobilized American Science for War

Recognizing that Nazi Germany led in critical technologies, Vannevar Bush left MIT, secured a brief meeting with Franklin Roosevelt, and proposed a science organization with a direct reporting line. Roosevelt approved the three-bullet proposal immediately, enabling Bush to mobilize civilian scientists for wartime research.

  • Refugee scientists warned that Germany held important technical advantages
  • Bush understood that existing military structures could not catch up quickly
  • He proposed a new group reporting directly to the president
  • FDR approved the plan during a ten-minute meeting
  • The resulting system accelerated technologies crucial to the Allied war effort

“there's a war coming and we're gonna lose because the army and the Navy will never catch up in time.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:07:32

“It was a ten minute meeting. If DR read it, looked him up and down, signed it.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:07:52
#vannevar-bush#fdr#world-war-two#science-policy

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway1:19:32

Some Failures Teach; Others Demand a Faster Personnel Change

Bahcall distinguishes unavoidable technical failure from leadership failures that persist because managers delay acting on a poor team fit. He also emphasizes treating people with dignity during difficult transitions because relationships outlast individual projects and companies.

  • A well-run experiment can fail because the underlying technology is wrong
  • Technical disappointment should not erase fair treatment of employees
  • Relationships often last longer than a company or project
  • Experienced CEOs frequently regret waiting too long to correct hiring mistakes
  • Some personnel problems cannot be coached away

“relationships last longer than any company or any project”

Safi Bahcall · 1:21:27

“Sometimes you can't fix a problem. Sometimes you just need to make a change.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:22:42
#failure#hiring#leadership#relationships
Takeaway1:26:39

Leaders Need People Who Can Tell Them When They Are Being Idiots

Authority makes honest feedback harder because employees depend on the leader and have incentives beyond candor. Bahcall recommends cultivating trusted truth-tellers, including outsiders who can challenge internal assumptions and supply perspectives unavailable within the organization.

  • Power changes other people's incentives to speak honestly
  • Internal reports may avoid feedback that threatens their interests
  • Trusted outsiders can provide more independent judgment
  • Leaders should deliberately seek perspectives beyond their organization
  • Candor requires relationships established before a crisis

“you can count on to tell you when you're being an idiot, to tell you the truth”

Safi Bahcall · 1:26:52

“sometimes it's important to get out of your organization, listen to people who are really out there and get different perspectives.”

Safi Bahcall · 1:27:18
#leadership#feedback#decision-making#candor