When a Billionaire Calls Revenge Philanthropy
Thiel framed the campaign against Gawker as an attempt to reject technological determinism and change media culture. Holiday and Ritholtz emphasize how personal revenge, ideology, and immense wealth can combine to rationalize extreme action as a public good.
- Thiel considered the campaign philanthropic
- He viewed Gawker as a symbol of harmful media culture
- His motives mixed ideology and revenge
- Wealth and ideology can both enable moral rationalization
“Peter has come to say that he believes this is the most philanthrop thing he's ever done.”
“it's this complicated mix of motivation”