Why Most Active Managers Should Underperform
Housel argues that widespread active-management underperformance is not proof that the entire profession is fraudulent or incompetent. Like college athletes attempting to reach the NBA, participants are competing for scarce elite outcomes, so only a small percentage should achieve sustained outperformance.
- Active management distributes relative wins and losses
- Exceptional rewards should correspond to a low success rate
- Underperformance alone does not prove a field lacks skill
- The relevant question is whether an individual has a credible path into the successful minority
“the jump from uh from good to really good is going to have a big calling effect.”
“maybe ten percent of you will outperform over the long run.”