How St. Louis Disproved the 1918 Social-Distancing Myth
Pandemic planners revisited the belief that social interventions had failed in 1918. They found that St. Louis acted earlier relative to the virus's arrival than Philadelphia, helping explain the cities' sharply different death rates.
- Public-health elites had concluded that social interventions did not work
- Researchers reinvestigated the 1918 evidence
- Timing relative to viral arrival explained divergent outcomes
- Earlier implementation mattered more than the mere existence of a policy
“actually the social distancing stuff did work.”
“social distancing policies we were implemented in St. Louis earlier in relation to the arrival of the virus than they were in Philadelphia.”