MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Lakshman Achuthan29 November 2014

Masters in Business: COO of ECRI Lakshman Achuthan (Audio)

3Frameworks
10Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 3

Myth Buster18:13

The Stock Market Does Not Give Years of Recession Warning

Stock prices are a short-leading economic indicator, not a dependable long-range oracle. Achuthan estimates an average lead of roughly five or six months, with variation around individual peaks and troughs, and notes that stocks have risen during some recessions.

  • Stocks generally lead the economy by one or two quarters
  • Average lead time conceals meaningful variation
  • The lead may differ at economic peaks and troughs
  • Stocks rose during three of the previous fifteen recessions discussed
  • Market prices alone are an imperfect recession signal

“The stock prices are a short leading indicator of the economy.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 18:30

“it's a short leader is maybe five six months average lead”

Lakshman Achuthan · 18:57
#stock market#recession#lead time#investing
Myth Buster43:22

The Fed's Wealth Effect May Reverse Cause and Effect

The conversation argues that rising stocks usually accompany gains in income, employment, manufacturing, and sales because those fundamentals support market values. Attempting to manufacture the same prosperity by lifting asset prices reverses the normal causal chain and may produce a disconnect between expectations and sustainable growth.

  • Strong cycles lift employment, income, manufacturing, and sales
  • Improving fundamentals commonly support equity prices
  • Higher asset prices do not automatically create broad prosperity
  • Market and economic fundamentals can temporarily disconnect
  • Persistent disconnection may require a painful reconciliation

“But actually that's getting the causation backwards.”

Barry Ritholtz · 44:24

“All these good things are making the stock market, and that's where the FED gets it backwards.”

Barry Ritholtz · 44:42
#wealth effect#federal reserve#stock market#causation
Myth Buster56:03

Rising Hourly Earnings Can Conceal Falling Take-Home Pay

Average hourly earnings can rise for a statistically unfavorable reason: paid hours may contract faster than wages. Workers then appear to earn more per hour while working fewer hours and receiving less total income, making net income and household financial capacity more informative than the headline rate.

  • Hourly earnings and total income measure different outcomes
  • Falling hours can mechanically lift the average hourly figure
  • Workers may earn less overall despite a higher hourly rate
  • Households may compensate by drawing down savings
  • Headline wage statistics require examination of their components

“The reason that's going up is because the pace at which your hours are being reduced, and is go is they're being reduced faster than…”

Lakshman Achuthan · 56:18

“So your average hourly earnings go up, but NETT income going down.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 56:41
#wages#income#labor market#statistics

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take30:55

The Yo-Yo Years: Low Growth Makes Every Downswing Riskier

Achuthan describes a regime of weaker trend growth and more frequent recessions as the “Yo Yo years.” When an economy operates at low altitude, even ordinary cyclical volatility can push growth below zero, as illustrated by repeated recessions in Europe and Japan.

  • US trend growth had weakened over successive recoveries
  • The Great Moderation masked declining economic altitude
  • Low trend growth increases the chance that a downturn becomes negative
  • Europe experienced repeated post-crisis recessions
  • Japan endured six recessions in twenty-one years

“we call it the yo Yo years were we've entered our Yoyo years, which is a period of weaker growth and more frequent recessions.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 30:58

“The problem is if the volatility returns and you're altitude level at that little level, you're in big trouble.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 31:54
#slow growth#secular stagnation#recessions#global economy
Hot Take40:38

Recessions Can Be Cathartic, Not Just Catastrophic

Achuthan challenges the binary view that every recession is an economic apocalypse. Although recessions cause real collateral damage, they can remove excesses, release pent-up demand, and establish conditions for more sustained growth; continuously pulling future demand forward may obstruct that reset.

  • Recessions vary from mild contractions to severe crises
  • Contractions can squeeze excesses out of the economy
  • Pent-up demand helps turn a vicious cycle into a virtuous one
  • Policies that continually borrow demand from the future can weaken later growth
  • Emergency intervention is easier to justify at crisis depths than indefinitely

“they can be very cathartic.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 40:52

“still these recessions do set you up for more sustained growth.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 41:43
#recession#creative destruction#pent-up demand#policy

Explainer· 4

Explainer23:48

Why Economic Stimulus Often Arrives Too Late

Fiscal intervention may help during a narrow tactical opportunity, but legislative delay makes precise countercyclical timing difficult. Achuthan argues that the 2007 stimulus checks arrived after recession had begun and that the 2009 recovery indicators turned up while later stimulus effects were still working through the system.

  • Policy may interrupt a vicious cycle during a narrow opportunity
  • Congressional action is often slower than the economic cycle
  • The 2007 stimulus arrived after the recession was underway
  • Leading indicators were already signaling recovery in spring 2009
  • A valid policy in principle can be mistimed in practice

“I think in principle, if there's these little tactical moments, you might be able to kind of throw a monkey wrench inside of that vicious…”

Lakshman Achuthan · 25:06

“even with that kind of consensus, it's just too slow.”

Barry Ritholtz · 26:47
#stimulus#fiscal policy#timing#recession
Explainer53:47

Productivity Software Saves Money by Eliminating Work

Business software can create compelling returns by allowing firms to perform the same functions with far fewer people. The productivity gain benefits companies but displaces workers, contributes to difficult career starts, and can leave younger and older workers struggling to adapt as jobs change faster than people can retrain.

  • Enterprise software is often sold through measurable cost savings
  • A small modern team can replace a much larger historical workforce
  • Productivity investment may explicitly remove jobs
  • Graduating during recession can depress lifetime earnings
  • New high-paying technology and energy jobs may not offset displacement at scale

“Ten forget twenty years ago. Ten years ago would have taken forty people.”

Barry Ritholtz · 54:40

“the job market is uh uh changing quicker than people can evolve.”

Barry Ritholtz · 54:49
#automation#productivity#employment#software
Explainer49:00

Inflation in Needs Can Crush the Economy's Cyclical Spending

Price increases in food, energy, healthcare, and education matter because households cannot easily avoid them. Even when an individual expense occupies a smaller budget share than in the past, rising necessities can leave less money for discretionary purchases, forcing households toward savings depletion or additional credit.

  • Food and energy are substantially non-discretionary
  • Higher essential costs reduce money available for wants
  • Discretionary spending is especially sensitive to the business cycle
  • A retail rebound concentrated in necessities may overstate consumer strength
  • Households may preserve consumption by using savings or borrowing

“the money that's left for discretionary spending, which is very cyclical, is smaller”

Lakshman Achuthan · 49:16

“it's what people need. It's not what they want, but they're buying.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 49:29
#inflation#consumer spending#household budgets#retail
Explainer1:24:55

How Reactive Central Banks Can Make Economic Swings Larger

Countercyclical policy could theoretically restrain an upswing and cushion a downturn, but that requires acting ahead of the cycle. Achuthan argues that central banks are commonly reactive; when intervention arrives late, feedback effects can amplify both highs and lows instead of smoothing them.

  • Preemptive policy requires reliable forward-looking signals
  • Rate increases during an upswing could restrain excess
  • Rate cuts during a downturn could soften contraction
  • Late policy can become procyclical
  • Near-zero rates leave little conventional capacity for the next recession

“if they're ahead of the cycle, not behind it, uh, then they could act countercyclically.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 1:25:05

“And that's actually pro cyclical because if you're hind the highs are higher behind the curve.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 1:25:54
#central banks#interest rates#monetary policy#cycles

Story· 1

Story07:19

How the Original Leading Economic Index Was Invented

Achuthan traces modern business-cycle analysis from Wesley Mitchell through Jeffrey Moore and Commerce Department statistician Julius Shiskin. Moore refined leading indicators for both revivals and recessions, while Shiskin helped turn the individual series into a composite index that was transferred to the government.

  • Wesley Mitchell helped formalize the study of business cycles
  • Jeffrey Moore extended leading indicators to cover revivals and recessions
  • Julius Shiskin helped develop the composite-index statistics
  • The original leading index combined indicator selection with statistical aggregation

“The Wall Street Journal called him uh the father of leading indicators.”

Lakshman Achuthan · 07:30

“They put the leading indicators in the composite index together, those two ideas, and there's your original index of leading economic Indicators”

Lakshman Achuthan · 09:18
#economic history#leading indicators#business cycles#nber