Active Funds Can Differ From a Benchmark Without Adding Value
Norton explains why career risk encourages active managers to remain close to benchmarks even when they market themselves as distinctive. Modern analytics make it easier to distinguish meaningful active decisions from expensive differences that fail to improve results.
- High-conviction portfolios accept benchmark divergence
- Incorrect concentrated calls can be costly
- Career risk encourages closet indexing
- Active share alone does not prove that differences add value
“when you're wrong and you weren't close to the benchmark, it's incredibly costly.”
“whether that difference leads to outperformance or just expensive differences.”