Why Intellectual Property Rights Alone Cannot Guarantee Innovation
Cook's Russian banking research challenged the conventional idea that protecting intellectual property is sufficient to produce innovation. She observed that inventors also need personal security, confidence that ideas will be protected in practice, and institutions that let them participate in markets.
- Russian entrepreneurs asked why innovation was not emerging
- Formal intellectual-property protection may be necessary but insufficient
- Physical security and institutional trust affect inventive activity
- Historical evidence can reveal mechanisms obscured in contemporary data
“the conventional wisdom was that if you protected if a country protected intellectual property rights, that was sufficient for innovation to come from”
“if I were an inventor, I'm not sure i'd feel secure here.”