Why Post-Streak Percentages Are Not Neutral Benchmarks
Selecting only shots that follow a run of successes changes the finite sample being analyzed. The preceding successes are consumed by the selection condition, while a miss ends the eligible sequence, creating a systematic downward bias in the measured post-streak percentage even when every shot is independent.
- Retrospective conditioning uses information from adjacent outcomes
- Completed streaks remove successes from the remaining finite sample
- A miss acts as a stopping event
- Equal post-hit and post-miss percentages can indicate improved performance
“Not in reality, their probability is always the same. But we don't observe the probability. We calculate the percentage, and that's where the biases come…”
“But the mistake is understanding the benchmark.”