How High Return Assumptions Make Pension Liabilities Look Smaller
Sharpe argues that public pension promises should be valued like bond-like obligations, using rates appropriate to their risk. Instead, discounting liabilities at a fund's optimistic expected return lowers their reported present value and creates pressure to allocate to hedge funds or private equity with higher assumed returns.
- Promised pension payments resemble bond obligations.
- A higher discount rate lowers the reported present value of liabilities.
- Better-looking funding ratios reduce apparent contribution requirements.
- High assumed returns can encourage allocations to expensive alternative assets.
- Sharpe rejects the host's legal conclusion of fraud.
“they should be valued like bonds.”
“if we increase our expected return, we can discount the promised payments at a higher rate, and their present value will be lower”