ETFs Are Not Free When Spreads and Discounts Widen
Navellier argues that an ETF's expense ratio does not capture the full cost of buying and selling it. Premiums, discounts, rebalancing costs, and flash-crash liquidity failures can make trading materially more expensive, so he regards ETFs as better suited to buy-and-hold use than frequent trading.
- ETF entry and exit prices can diverge from net asset value.
- Rebalancing and exchange spreads create costs beyond the stated expense ratio.
- Flash crashes can leave the ETF trading while underlying stocks cannot be priced.
- Navellier recommends buy-and-hold use rather than active ETF trading.
“the e t F world, you gotta be careful because et F s can have premiums to get in and discounts to get out”
“I think ETFs are better for buy and hold investing than than trading.”