No Company Is Too Technical or Mature for Governance to Matter
Gramm rejects both the claim that activists cannot contribute at complicated technology companies and the claim that mature consumer businesses can run themselves. Technical firms still need the right leadership, while mature firms face consequential decisions about dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, and competitive threats.
- Complex technology does not excuse prolonged bad governance
- Mature businesses still require active capital allocation
- Dividends, buybacks, and acquisitions demand judgment
- GM's decline shows that apparent competitive security can vanish
“if it's a like a highly you know, complicated company, then like like it matters who the CEO is”
“with a mature business, like you have to allocate the capital”