MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Emanuel Derman26 February 2016

Interview With Emanuel Derman: Masters in Business (Audio)

3Frameworks
12Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 2

Myth Buster34:42

Models Were a Tool in the Crisis, Not Its Fundamental Cause

Derman attributes the financial crisis primarily to low interest rates and the search for yield. Models played a secondary role by helping construct and rate instruments that appeared to offer high yield with low risk, sometimes deceptively, but he does not treat modeling as the crisis's root cause.

  • Low rates encouraged investors to stretch for yield.
  • Models helped package instruments as high-yield and low-risk.
  • Rating agencies contributed to the credibility of those claims.
  • The modeling failure was secondary to broader incentives and risk-taking.

“models played a secondary role in that they were used to construct, perhaps somewhat deceptively, through the rating agencies instruments that that purported to give…”

Emanuel Derman · 35:17

“predictions and forecasts and marketing because that's all they are.”

Emanuel Derman · 37:02
#financial crisis#yield#rating agencies#models
Myth Buster38:36

Markets Are Only Eventually and Somewhat Efficient

Derman calls the efficient-market idea a model rather than a valid theory because real markets are inefficient. He characterizes efficiency as partial and eventual, and jokes that economists turned their inability to predict markets into a principle.

  • The efficient-market model does not literally describe market behavior.
  • Real markets contain inefficiencies.
  • Efficiency can emerge imperfectly over longer periods.
  • Indexing still relies on active participants searching for value.

“markets are inefficient. Um. It's a model. It's not a description of the way the world actually is.”

Emanuel Derman · 39:57

“markets are kind of sort of eventually somewhat efficient”

Emanuel Derman · 40:10
#efficient markets#indexing#market theory

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take13:55

Risk Takers Should Not Privatize Gains and Socialize Losses

Derman argues that anyone claiming capitalism's upside from taking risk must also bear the downside when the risk fails. He views crisis rescues without corresponding public participation in the recovery as ethically inconsistent and a source of moral hazard.

  • The right to profit from risk carries exposure to failure.
  • A rescue acts like a put that protects a company from death.
  • Public downside protection should be matched by public upside participation.
  • Asymmetric rescue weakens accountability and creates moral hazard.

“If you want to be somebody that benefits from taking risk, you also have to benefit when taking risk kills you.”

Emanuel Derman · 14:33

“they were essentially given a put if you look at it from an options point of view, they were safe from death”

Emanuel Derman · 14:51
#bailouts#capitalism#moral hazard#risk
Hot Take32:12

Taking a Financial Model Too Seriously Becomes Idolatry

Derman warns that treating a model as a complete account of human behavior mistakes a formula for reality. People are too complicated to remain captured by a fixed equation, so slavish confidence in mathematical outputs creates long-run trouble.

  • Models cannot fully encode complex human behavior.
  • Formulaic precision can create false confidence.
  • Market participants react and change their behavior.
  • Good quantitative work requires taste rather than blind obedience to mathematics.

“if you take a model too seriously, it's a kind of idolatry”

Emanuel Derman · 32:12

“people are too complicated and and if you really believe that you can capture people in a formula equation, you're you're looking for trouble in…”

Emanuel Derman · 32:23
#model risk#human behavior#mathematics

Explainer· 3

Explainer09:45

Why Financial Models Are Metaphors, Not Theories

Derman distinguishes a model from a theory by treating models as analogies that map something understood onto something less understood. Brownian motion accurately describes physical diffusion, but stock prices can jump and crash, so applying that image to markets remains a limited metaphor rather than a literal account.

  • Models use analogies to make unfamiliar systems understandable.
  • A theory closely describes how something actually behaves.
  • Stock-price behavior violates the smooth diffusion metaphor during jumps and crashes.
  • Every analogy eventually reaches a point where it breaks down.

“models seemed to me to the analogies”

Emanuel Derman · 09:59

“stock prices don't behave that way. Volatility jumps, stock prices crash”

Emanuel Derman · 11:34
#models#theory#metaphor#finance
Explainer27:36

Why Quantitative Alpha Has a Shorter Life

Derman explains that quantitative ideas spread as employees move between firms and as practitioners mine finance papers for anomalies. Once competitors copy the same model or crowd the same trade, the opportunity is arbitraged away or loses effectiveness, shortening the useful life of alpha.

  • People carry models and ideas between firms.
  • Published finance research provides anomalies that can be implemented broadly.
  • Imitation turns a profitable approach into a crowded trade.
  • Competition shortens the lifespan of quantitative alpha.

“these models propagate a lot and and become become widely used, and that does cut into the so called alpha of of everybody.”

Emanuel Derman · 28:11

“these methods are finding alpha getting a short run, shorter lifetime.”

Emanuel Derman · 29:05
#alpha#competition#quant investing#crowding
Explainer56:17

Structural Models Explain Why; Statistical Models Find Patterns

Derman contrasts structural derivatives models, which represent an option as a hybrid of a stock and bond, with econometric models that search for regressions among factors and markets. High-frequency and algorithmic trading pushed students and practitioners toward statistical pattern detection, even when the causal reason matters less.

  • Structural models encode an economic composition or mechanism.
  • Statistical models search for predictive relationships in data.
  • Algorithmic trading increased the popularity of econometrics.
  • A pattern can work without establishing causation, which creates fragility.

“there've been sort of two classes of models that people use in finance. One or structural models”

Emanuel Derman · 56:17

“correlation is not causation, and I think that's true.”

Emanuel Derman · 58:22
#structural models#econometrics#algorithms#correlation

Story· 2

Story08:22

How Leverage Turned LTCM's Small Edges Into Ruin

Derman describes Long-Term Capital Management buying cheap, illiquid instruments expected to revert toward fair value. Extreme leverage magnified tiny pricing differences, and Russia's default triggered a flight to quality that made investors reject the illiquid assets LTCM held, putting the firm out of business.

  • LTCM targeted small deviations in relatively illiquid assets.
  • The trade depended on eventual mean reversion.
  • Heavy leverage amplified small spreads and reduced resilience.
  • A crisis-driven flight to quality moved the market against the portfolio.

“they leveraged up like crazy to accentuate small pennies differences.”

Emanuel Derman · 08:43

“Nobody wants to hold the liquid stuff, and they were so overleveraged that they were they were put out of business.”

Emanuel Derman · 08:53
#ltcm#leverage#liquidity#risk
Story17:21

How Quants Moved From Wall Street Outsiders to the Mainstream

Derman recalls that quant was once used pejoratively and that technical credentials could carry stigma on Wall Street. The success and visibility of quantitative hedge funds, along with the internet era's elevation of technological competence, gradually increased respect for quants, though traders and quants still occupied different status levels for years.

  • Quant once carried a mocking or pejorative meaning.
  • Technical conversations and credentials could be socially awkward on Wall Street.
  • Quantitative fund success made mathematical skill harder to dismiss.
  • Quants often remained support staff rather than position takers.

“quant was a derogatory word.”

Emanuel Derman · 18:03

“you were a support person, you went a position taker.”

Emanuel Derman · 22:28
#quants#wall street#careers#goldman sachs

Takeaway· 3

Takeaway07:30

Building a Model Means Being Short Volatility

Derman says a financial model usually works only within a narrow regime resembling the environment in which it was built. Negative rates, volatility spikes, and crises expose that dependence because a changed world makes the model wrong even if it previously made money.

  • Financial models depend on a relatively stable regime.
  • A change in the world changes the model's reliability.
  • Profitability does not make a model literally correct.
  • Stress conditions reveal hidden regime dependence.

“anytime you build a model, it's a financial model is mathematical. You have to keep in the back of your head that you're actually short…”

Emanuel Derman · 07:30

“Most models only work in a very narrow regime where things are more or less like the world you're in currently.”

Emanuel Derman · 07:43
#model risk#volatility#regimes
Takeaway1:27:32

Learn to Program and Be Willing to Do Your Own Dirty Work

Derman advises young people to expect more than one career, become capable programmers, and remain willing to work directly rather than aspiring only to management. He also says deep involvement can make an initially unfamiliar or applied field unexpectedly interesting.

  • Expect a career to change direction more than once.
  • Programming increases the ability to execute ideas independently.
  • Hands-on work builds capability before management becomes relevant.
  • Going deeply into a field can reveal an unexpected world of interesting problems.

“expect to have more than one career.”

Emanuel Derman · 1:28:04

“get good at programming, at least that's my experience in almost anything.”

Emanuel Derman · 1:28:17
#career advice#programming#learning#quant finance
Takeaway1:31:00

Derman's Investing Lesson: Do Not Sell at the Bottom

Asked what he wished he had known thirty years earlier, Derman says not to exit merely because conditions look bad. His lesson is to avoid selling at the bottom, maintain a long-term view, and ignore fluctuations rather than assuming a severe decline must continue to zero.

  • Bad-looking conditions can provoke destructive exits.
  • Selling during collapse can lock in the bottom.
  • A long-term view reduces reactions to short-run fluctuations.
  • Severe declines do not automatically imply a fall to zero.

“Don't get out when things look bad.”

Emanuel Derman · 1:31:04

“take a long term VI you and ignore the fluctuations.”

Emanuel Derman · 1:31:25
#long-term investing#market declines#behavior