MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Graeme Forster13 October 2023

Graeme Forster on Global Longevity Investments

3Frameworks
11Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster1:04:30

Economic Growth Does Not Guarantee Shareholder Returns

India offers a compelling demographic and productivity narrative, but its promise is already reflected in expensive valuations. Indonesia offers similar structural growth at much lower prices, while investor apathy limits competing capital and can improve incumbents' per-share economics.

  • A strong national growth story can already be priced into stocks.
  • Economic earnings growth may not translate into per-share growth.
  • Capital issuance diluted the returns from the celebrated BRIC thesis.
  • Apathy can produce both cheaper valuations and less competitive investment.
  • Indonesia may offer stronger per-share economics than fashionable markets.

“India is an really interesting area in terms of the geopolitics, in terms of the population story, in terms of the you know, the per…”

Graeme Forster · 1:04:43

“What hasn't come true investment returns. Why has that not come true? Because everybody wanted a piece of them.”

Graeme Forster · 1:06:02
#indonesia#india#emerging-markets#valuation

Hot Take· 1

Hot Take11:06

Capitalism Needs Visible Winners Much Like a Lottery

A simulation of 1,000 investors over 50 years produced an extremely uneven distribution of terminal wealth even when returns came from the same historical distribution. Forster argues that visible outliers such as famous entrepreneurs and investors motivate participation in capitalism, much as jackpots attract lottery players, although capitalism includes far more skill and positive-sum productivity.

  • Compounded market returns naturally create uneven wealth outcomes.
  • Nonlinear distributions produce a small number of highly visible winners.
  • Capitalism includes skill and productive growth, unlike a negative-expected-value lottery.
  • Hard work can improve a person's position without guaranteeing billionaire status.

“That is a function of capitalism. It's not a it's not a bug. It's part of the system.”

Graeme Forster · 12:10

“on the lottery side is pure randomness, and there's a negative ev game.”

Graeme Forster · 13:50
#capitalism#wealth#lottery#compounding

Explainer· 4

Explainer05:40

Why Investing Resembles Poker More Than Chess

Forster argues that poker and investing require disciplined decisions under uncertainty, while short-term outcomes contain substantial luck. Markets are even harder because feedback may take years, allowing early wins to create false confidence and sustain inefficiency.

  • Poker combines skill with substantial short-term luck.
  • Investing provides slower and noisier feedback than card games.
  • Early gains can persuade unskilled participants that they have an edge.
  • Persistent uncertainty helps sustain market inefficiencies.

“Sounds like, Well, it's the same thing, right, It's the same skill set.”

Graeme Forster · 06:02

“game playing with large elements of uncertainty draw people in who aren't necessarily suited to the rigor of the activity.”

Graeme Forster · 07:22
#uncertainty#poker#investing#decision-making
Explainer24:15

How Orbis Refunds Performance Fees After Underperformance

Orbis places part of its performance fee into a reserve or escrow-like bucket. If subsequent underperformance offsets the earlier alpha, money is returned to clients, reducing net volatility and making the manager share more directly in the client's experience.

  • Fees are earned from performance above the benchmark.
  • Part of the earned amount remains available for later refunds.
  • Offsetting underperformance means the client should not retain a net fee burden.
  • The structure transfers business volatility from clients toward the manager.
  • A stronger balance sheet is needed to sustain the model.

“We refund the fee.”

Graeme Forster · 24:33

“you're transferring the volatility from the client to the manager right,”

Graeme Forster · 29:27
#fees#alignment#asset-management#alpha
Explainer46:08

Why a Negative Term Premium Signals Duration Mispricing

The term premium should compensate bondholders for uncertainty about future inflation and real rates. Forster views its historically unusual negative level as evidence that long-duration assets became overpriced, contributing to valuation extremes resembling the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras.

  • Long yields include expected inflation, expected real rates, and a term premium.
  • The term premium compensates investors for uncertainty over time.
  • A negative premium implies inadequate compensation for duration risk.
  • Low term premiums can inflate valuations for long-duration growth assets.
  • The correction may continue even after the most extreme valuations subside.

“that tells you there's a huge mispricing in duration, a huge mispricing on the long end of the curve.”

Graeme Forster · 47:12

“I would be concerned about duration still.”

Graeme Forster · 50:46
#term-premium#duration#bonds#valuation
Explainer53:33

Japan's Governance Reform Is an Internal Decade-Long Shift

Japan's companies have historically carried excess cash and cross-shareholdings that weakened capital efficiency. Forster says regulators, the government, and the stock exchange are now driving an internal, consensus-compatible reform process that could release capital to shareholders and more productive businesses over roughly a decade.

  • Excess cash and cross-shareholdings have depressed capital efficiency.
  • Long-term relationships are more effective than confrontational activism in Japan.
  • Pressure is coming from domestic institutions and regulators.
  • Early adoption can snowball in a consensus-oriented business culture.
  • Unwinding cross-shareholdings will take years.

“I don't think this is activist driven. I don't think it's a threat of activists or the presence of activists that are driving this change.”

Graeme Forster · 57:17

“Yeah, it's a decade because it takes a long time to unwind cross shareholdings.”

Graeme Forster · 58:38
#japan#governance#capital-allocation#equities

Q&A· 1

Q&A1:02:07

China May Be Investable, but Only at the Right Risk Premium

Forster does not declare China categorically uninvestable, but insists that geopolitical, ideological, and governance uncertainty must be reflected in valuation. He proposes evaluating a company such as Alibaba as though purchasing the entire business for 30 years, which exposes risks that a superficially cheap multiple may conceal.

  • Investability depends on the risk premium offered.
  • Cheap standalone valuation does not remove political uncertainty.
  • A whole-business, 30-year thought experiment clarifies ownership risk.
  • Government intervention can overwhelm conventional company analysis.

“China's investible, I think, and it's a question of risk premium.”

Graeme Forster · 1:02:14

“would you go and spend that on buying the business outright as a long term investment, buying Ali Baba for the next thirty years?”

Graeme Forster · 1:02:37
#china#risk-premium#geopolitics#alibaba

Tool· 1

Tool32:13

Value Commodity Producers With a Normalized Price Deck

Rather than forecast the next commodity move, Forster values producers using a normalized oil, gas, or commodity price. He then estimates sustainable free cash flow and growth from that base, exploiting the fact that share prices may fluctuate much more than underlying business value.

  • Start with a normalized commodity price rather than the spot price.
  • Estimate free cash flow under that normalized environment.
  • Assess growth from the normalized cash-flow base.
  • Use price volatility to find gaps between market capitalization and business value.

“what is a normalized pricing, what sort of free cash flow can you generate? And how can you grow from that base?”

Graeme Forster · 32:49

“you don't get that much swing in the true underlying value in the businesses.”

Graeme Forster · 33:11
#commodities#valuation#cash-flow#energy

Takeaway· 3

Takeaway19:53

Intrinsic Value Is the Market's Ultimate Long-Term Signal

Forster chose fundamental investing over a quantitative career because an equity represents ownership in a real business. Prices can move rapidly, but the enduring signal is the business's underlying value, revealed through years of cash flows and operating development.

  • Both quantitative and fundamental investors search for signal amid noise.
  • A stock represents partial ownership of a business.
  • Business value ultimately anchors long-term prices.
  • Intrinsic value evolves more slowly than market prices.

“What is the ultimate signal? And for me, what is a stock? Is a what is an equity? It's a piece of a business.”

Graeme Forster · 20:37

“the ultimate signal in terms of determining where a price goes over the long term is the value of that business.”

Graeme Forster · 20:48
#intrinsic-value#fundamental-investing#equities
Takeaway35:51

Investors Are Price Takers, So Flexibility Becomes an Edge

Investors cannot command the market to produce opportunities; they must wait for price to detach from business value. Forster therefore emphasizes flexible mandates, broad research coverage, and the freedom to move capital across countries and sectors as dislocations migrate.

  • Market prices determine when opportunities appear.
  • Mispricings move rather than remaining fixed in one region or sector.
  • Flexible capital can follow the largest discounts.
  • Research depth and breadth are both necessary to keep finding ideas.

“As an investor, you're a price taker. You're just waiting.”

Graeme Forster · 36:09

“inefficiencies don't static, They move right and they evolve.”

Graeme Forster · 36:44
#flexibility#mispricing#portfolio-management#opportunity
Takeaway1:13:41

Judge the Investment Process, Not One Random Outcome

Poker repeatedly demonstrates that good decisions can lose and bad decisions can win over short periods. Forster applies that lesson to investing: evaluate the information, probabilities, and reasoning available when the decision was made instead of retrofitting quality from the eventual result.

  • Investment outcomes combine skill and luck.
  • A single result is weak evidence about decision quality.
  • Process review reduces hindsight bias.
  • Lessons are internalized more deeply through experience.
  • Make the best available decision without demanding certainty.

“it's it's all about thinking about the process rather than the outcome.”

Graeme Forster · 1:13:53

“make the best decision you can at the time with all the information you have, and have no regrets.”

Graeme Forster · 1:17:05
#process#luck#decision-making#mindset