MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Leslie Gelb14 August 2015

Foreign Affairs Expert Leslie Gelb: Masters in Business (Audio)

4Frameworks
11Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster42:50

America Was Fighting Vietnamese Nationalism, Not Just Communism

Gelb argues that American leaders misread Vietnam primarily as a front in a global communist campaign. Vietnamese nationalism gave local forces motivation and legitimacy that superior American equipment could not overcome.

  • American policy interpreted Vietnam through the Cold War
  • Ho Chi Minh held powerful nationalist legitimacy
  • Local troops were defending their own country
  • Motivation and political identity outweighed technical superiority

“In the case of Vietnam, it was nationalism that we were fighting.”

Leslie Gelb · 42:50

“There was only one problem. The North Vietnamese fought better.”

Leslie Gelb · 43:47
#vietnam#nationalism#communism#war

Hot Take· 1

Hot Take22:08

Gelb: Saudi Arabia Caused America More Trouble Than Iran

Gelb challenges the conventional classification of Saudi Arabia as a dependable American ally. He attributes significant financing of jihadist groups, weapons, and extremist religious schools to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.

  • Gelb ranks Saudi conduct as more damaging to America than Iran's
  • Gulf money helped finance jihadist organizations
  • Saudi-funded madrasas spread fundamentalism and anti-American values
  • Official reluctance to confront the conduct preserves the ally narrative

“But if you ask me, Saudi Arabia has caused the United States far more trouble over the last thirty forty years than Iran as”

Leslie Gelb · 22:08

“Where did these funds come from? Where did the arms they've been fighting with come from? They come mainly from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf…”

Leslie Gelb · 22:27
#saudi arabia#iran#terrorism#middle east

Explainer· 6

Explainer10:54

Why Economic Power Has Replaced Force as the Main Global Instrument

Gelb argues that military force once settled most disputes between nations, while trade and investment now occupy a far more central role. Interstate warfare has become historically uncommon, with most contemporary wars occurring within countries instead.

  • Military force historically served as the main arbiter between nations
  • Modern international transactions use comparatively little force
  • Most current wars are internal rather than interstate
  • Economic strength now directly shapes foreign-policy influence

“Economics is really now central two power in foreign policy to power in international relations.”

Leslie Gelb · 10:59

“If you look at most international transactions today, there is very very little force. Historically unprecedented little force between nations.”

Leslie Gelb · 11:57
#economic power#war#foreign policy#trade
Explainer13:38

China Is a Global Economic Power but Only a Regional Military Power

Gelb describes China as the first global great power without worldwide military reach. Its forces remain concentrated around its borders and adjacent seas, while trade and investment give it influence in regions where its military presence is negligible.

  • China lacks the overseas bases required for global military reach
  • Its military buildup is concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region
  • China seeks dominance around its borders and nearby waters
  • Trade and investment create influence far beyond its armed forces

“China is the first global power, global great power not to be a global military power.”

Leslie Gelb · 13:43

“But China counts around the world, not because it can apply military force in the Middle East or Africa whatever. No one even thinks of…”

Leslie Gelb · 15:20
#china#military#trade#asia
Explainer18:24

Why Great Powers Struggle to Control Conflicts Inside Other Countries

Modern conflicts increasingly arise within countries, where outside leverage is less effective than it is in disputes between states. Domestic political structures, civil wars, cultures, and local interests make outcomes difficult for even major powers to shape.

  • Major powers possess less effective leverage than they once did
  • Internal conflicts are harder to influence than interstate disputes
  • Domestic politics and civil wars resist external control
  • Military force cannot resolve centuries of culture and internal division

“It's a new era of foreign policy generally, because problems are becoming more and more difficult to solve”

Leslie Gelb · 18:28

“All of a sudden, we throw in the troops as if force is going to solve centuries of culture, politics, and internal problems, and it…”

Leslie Gelb · 41:29
#civil war#intervention#power#diplomacy
Explainer21:03

Gelb Says Saudi Arabia Kept Oil Cheap to Limit Iran

Gelb interprets low oil prices as a foreign-policy instrument rather than a simple market outcome. He argues that Gulf producers wanted to reduce the revenue Iran could obtain when it reentered global oil markets.

  • Gulf states could tolerate lower per-barrel revenue
  • Iran's expected return to the oil market shaped production policy
  • Lower prices would reduce Iran's additional income
  • Oil policy can serve geopolitical objectives

“It's as low it is because they're keeping it that way, and they're keeping it that way in anticipation of Iran joining the oil market…”

Leslie Gelb · 21:31

“they want to make sure that Iran can't put its hand on as many bucks as the Iranian leaders may may hope, so they're keeping…”

Leslie Gelb · 21:43
#oil#saudi arabia#iran#geopolitics
Explainer53:56

How American Politics Lost Its National-Interest Coalition

Gelb recalls a Senate in which a group from both parties would put politics aside on critical issues. As moderates became frustrated and departed, committed extremists—particularly on the right—remained and gained greater control.

  • Extremists previously existed at the political margins
  • A bipartisan group once collaborated on important national problems
  • Moderate figures left as politics became more frustrating
  • Far-right activists used the opening to expand their influence

“The difference not that they were marginalized, it's that they were what I would call five or so national interest senators of both parties who…”

Leslie Gelb · 54:08

“The people who unfortunately didn't get frustrated with the extremists, particularly on the right. Uh, they decided that this was their great opportunity to go…”

Leslie Gelb · 54:53
#congress#polarization#moderates#politics
Explainer1:03:38

Russia Holds Local Military Superiority on Its Western Border

Gelb distinguishes Russia's diminished global position from its strong local advantage around Ukraine. Because Russia can escalate more quickly and heavily near its own borders, Western military pressure there must be paired with diplomacy.

  • Russia is no longer a global superpower but remains a great power
  • Russian forces possess a local advantage around Ukraine
  • The West has superiority farther from Russia's borders
  • Russia can match or exceed Western escalation in eastern Ukraine

“The second thing you have to understand is that on their western borders, Russia has military superiority over the United States and the West.”

Leslie Gelb · 1:03:42

“Beyond their borders, we have the superiority. But on their borders they've got it.”

Leslie Gelb · 1:04:49
#russia#ukraine#nato#military

Story· 2

Story26:44

Gelb Explained American Democracy to Fidel Castro as “Minorities Rule”

At dinner with Fidel Castro, Gelb argued that organized minorities dominate particular areas of American policy. The democratic distinction, he said, is not the absence of minority power but the public's ability to replace which minorities govern.

  • Organized constituencies can dominate individual policy areas
  • Gelb cited ethnic groups, issue groups, and Wall Street as examples
  • Castro treated minority influence as evidence against American democracy
  • Gelb answered that democratic power remains replaceable

“I said, you know, you don't understand that democracy is minorities rule.”

Leslie Gelb · 27:01

“I said, what we do because we have the power to change the minorities who do rule, and that can't be done here in Cuba.”

Leslie Gelb · 27:47
#democracy#cuba#fidel castro#politics
Story28:39

The Cuban General Who Cried When Gelb Said America Would Not Invade

A senior Cuban general described a continuing belief that the United States would launch a full-scale invasion. When Gelb explained why he considered that impossible, the general cried and embraced him, revealing how credible the threat still felt inside Cuba.

  • Cuban leaders remembered American attempts against Castro
  • The military still anticipated a possible American invasion
  • Gelb offered reasons an invasion would not occur
  • The general's emotional response appeared genuine to Gelb

“I think there is no chance the United States of America is going to invade Cuba.”

Leslie Gelb · 29:20

“I don't believe that was an act. I believe he really thought the United States was going to invade Cuba.”

Leslie Gelb · 29:39
#cuba#military#perception#united states

Takeaway· 1

Takeaway1:05:40

Diplomacy With Russia Requires Recognizing Its Great-Power Interests

Gelb says Russia should not control neighboring states, but its security interests cannot simply be ignored. He argues that Russia's capacity to help or harm Western objectives makes respectful diplomatic engagement strategically necessary.

  • Russia seeks recognition after losing status and territory following the Cold War
  • NATO and European expansion heightened Russian insecurity
  • Recognition does not require surrendering Baltic or Ukrainian sovereignty
  • Russia remains important in terrorism, Syria, Iraq, and nuclear proliferation

“You need diplomacy. You need to work a kind of relationship with the Russians where they are treated like a major power.”

Leslie Gelb · 1:05:42

“Russia is no longer a global superpower, but they are a great power.”

Leslie Gelb · 1:06:14
#russia#diplomacy#nato#great powers