The World Is Reglobalizing, Not Deglobalizing
Moore rejects the idea that US-China separation means globalization is ending. She expects trade and strategic relationships with other partners to deepen, producing a reconfigured global network rather than a retreat from international integration.
- US-China separation does not end global trade.
- Countries can deepen relationships with alternative partners.
- Supply chains and alliances are shifting rather than disappearing.
- Reglobalization is a more accurate description than deglobalization.
“I don't believe in deglobalization.”
“Maybe we call it reglobalization instead of deglobalization, but a shifting of some other relationships.”