The Dot-Com Bust Did Not Stop Internet Adoption
Anderson argues that the crash primarily reflected inflated financial valuations rather than a collapse in the internet's underlying utility. Adoption continued, while failed investments left behind cheap fiber infrastructure that enabled later bandwidth-intensive businesses.
- Valuations and technological adoption followed different paths
- Internet adoption curves barely show the market crash
- Failed investments made network capacity cheaper
- Cheap infrastructure lowered barriers for the next generation of companies
“We understood the distinction between the this this stock market valuations and the underlying technology”
“it's almost impossible to see the bust when you look at the underlying adoption curves and data curves, etcetera.”