A Redemption Feature Does Not Make a Private Asset Liquid
Calcano argues that evergreen wrappers and limited redemption provisions do not change the illiquid nature of their underlying investments. Investors should enter alternatives with a medium- to long-term need and duration in mind, treating redemption allowances as flexibility rather than dependable liquidity.
- The underlying assets remain illiquid regardless of wrapper
- A five-percent redemption provision can confuse investors
- Private credit may be shorter-duration but is still illiquid
- Alternatives should address medium- to long-term portfolio needs
“The underlying investments are still a liquid now.”
“But it doesn't mean that the product is liquid.”