The Low-Volatility Anomaly That Changed Montgomery's Thinking
A purely risk-based theory suggests that lower-volatility stocks should produce lower long-term returns. Their historical outperformance contradicted that expectation and pushed Montgomery toward behavioral explanations for factor returns.
- Value and small-company premiums can be framed as compensation for risk
- Low-volatility stocks are less risky under the standard-deviation definition
- Their stronger long-term performance conflicts with a simple risk-return relationship
- The anomaly suggests investor behavior also drives returns
“The low volatility is less risk by definition and should do less well over the long term. But the reverse is true.”
“If that's true, something else must be driving these stocks. What is that? And I think that's behavioral finance.”