Even a Perfect Investor Can Underperform for Years
Perfect foresight does not guarantee steady benchmark-relative success. Gray explains that market volatility can subject even a theoretically flawless allocator to prolonged underperformance and maximal pain before gains materialize.
- Perfect information does not eliminate the path of returns
- Long benchmark underperformance can coexist with eventual success
- Markets pressure investors before rewarding difficult positions
- Career risk can defeat a sound long-term strategy
“you could underperform the benchmark for a long period even though you're literally perfect”
“they're going to push you to maximal pain before the gains are there.”