MMasters in Business
← All episodes
18 March 2026

At The Money: Divorce Planning for the Ultra Wealthy

4Frameworks
5Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster01:24

Billionaire Divorces Differ Most in Scale and Privacy

Kilbain argues that celebrity and billionaire divorces are not fundamentally different from ordinary divorces. They involve more assets and complexity, but privacy concerns—especially access to court records and press attention—create a distinctive operational challenge.

  • Core divorce issues remain broadly similar across wealth levels
  • Large estates add complexity rather than changing the basic process
  • Open-record and sunshine laws can expose divorce filings
  • Both parties may benefit from resolving issues collaboratively and privately

“Celebrity divorces and billionaire divorces are not all that different.”

Patrick Kilbain · 01:28

“we are thinking constantly about how to play keep away from the press.”

Patrick Kilbain · 02:48
#divorce#privacy#billionaires#court-records

Story· 1

Story05:27

Even Billionaires May Need to Sell Shares to Fund a Divorce

Kilbain uses Steve and Elaine Wynn’s divorce to show that headline wealth does not equal available cash. Illiquid or concentrated holdings may have to be sold, making tax reduction and preservation of the total marital estate shared priorities.

  • Large net worth can coexist with limited liquidity
  • Divorce payments may force sales of concentrated shares
  • A forced liquidity event can generate taxes and market risk
  • Cooperation can help both parties maximize the divisible pool

“the Wins had to liquid eate shares of win resorts”

Patrick Kilbain · 05:45

“people are motivated together to reduce tax liabilities and work together to maximize the size of the pie.”

Patrick Kilbain · 06:15
#liquidity#concentration#founder-stock#tax

Q&A· 1

Q&A06:34

Should a Spouse Cash Out or Ride Along on Future Compensation?

Carried interest, restricted stock, options, and deferred compensation can keep former spouses financially linked. The parties must decide whether liquidity permits a discounted buyout or whether both will remain exposed to future performance and vesting risk.

  • Contingent compensation may require an ongoing post-divorce connection
  • A buyout requires enough current liquidity
  • Risk premiums should reflect the chance that compensation never materializes
  • Historical fund performance can inform expectations
  • Deferred and qualified status affect valuation

“do we have enough liquidity to buy that person out?”

Patrick Kilbain · 07:31

“history is a good place to look to too.”

Patrick Kilbain · 08:08
#carried-interest#restricted-stock#compensation#valuation

Tool· 1

Tool11:12

Use Appreciated Stock to Fund Shared Philanthropic Goals

When charitable giving is already part of the couple’s plan, highly appreciated founder stock can be contributed directly to a foundation, charity, or donor-advised fund. This can preserve the market-value charitable contribution while avoiding a taxable sale by the donor or recipient charity.

  • Confirm that philanthropy is an established goal
  • Bring in charitable-planning expertise
  • Consider charities, private foundations, and donor-advised funds
  • Direct stock gifts can avoid realizing capital gains
  • The charitable recipient can generally sell without paying capital-gains tax

“Donating appreciated stock to the charity, to a charitable foundation, to a donor advice fund is certainly a way to do that”

Patrick Kilbain · 11:30

“you don't have to worry about the capital gains tax, neither does the charity.”

Patrick Kilbain · 11:47
#philanthropy#appreciated-stock#capital-gains#donor-advised-fund

Takeaway· 1

Takeaway03:18

A One Percent Tax Error Becomes Enormous at Billionaire Scale

The mistakes made in wealthy divorces may resemble those in ordinary cases, but their financial impact is magnified. Complex estate-planning vehicles also make separation harder because structures designed to remain intact may carry substantial tax costs when dismantled.

  • Error types stay similar while dollar consequences expand
  • Long marriages may accumulate sophisticated estate structures
  • Dividing assets can trigger unintended tax consequences
  • Preserving an existing structure may sometimes be preferable to breaking it apart

“a one percent tax mistake in your case or my case is magnified tremendously”

Patrick Kilbain · 03:18

“What are the tax consequences as a result of separating or blown apart that estate plan?”

Patrick Kilbain · 04:27
#tax#estate-planning#wealth#divorce