The Expense Ratio Was Only Part of the Old Fund Cost
Historical mutual-fund costs extended beyond the published annual expense ratio. Investors could lose five percent immediately to a sales load, then continue paying annual expenses and trading costs, creating a substantial hurdle before earning a positive return.
- Sales loads could consume five percent upfront
- Annual expense ratios persisted year after year
- Trading costs added another layer
- Shelf-space arrangements influenced which products brokers offered
“The expense ratio is year after year. Then there's trading costs on top of that, so it's about two percent plus the five percent load.”
“You had to pay the company a fee like some sodas and potato chips due to supermarkets to be on that platform.”