MMasters in Business
← All episodes
Andrew Ang28 June 2019

Andrew Ang Discusses Asset Management (Podcast)

3Frameworks
14Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 2

Myth Buster17:31

Negative Bond Yields Are Strange, but Not Historically Unprecedented

Ang shifts attention from nominal yields to real rates and notes that negative real rates have occurred before. He also places nominally negative yields beside historical wealth-destruction mechanisms such as confiscation, demonetization, and restrictions on holding gold.

  • Real rates may be more informative than nominal rates
  • Negative real rates have historical precedents
  • Governments have previously imposed other forms of wealth destruction
  • Quality, trends, and resilience remain relevant in negative-yield environments

“what's really relevant here is the real rate rather than the nominal relative to inflation”

Andrew Ang · 18:16

“It's actually we've had these episodes before.”

Andrew Ang · 18:57
#negative yields#real rates#bonds#monetary history
Myth Buster38:46

Why Growth Is Not Simply the Opposite of Value

The common growth-versus-value split hides several distinct characteristics. Growth managers may seek sustainable trends and high-quality businesses, meaning a stock can carry momentum and quality exposures even if it is expensive on traditional value measures.

  • Expensive is the direct opposite of cheap value
  • Growth portfolios often contain momentum exposure
  • Growth portfolios can also emphasize quality
  • A single stock can express several factors simultaneously

“it's growth. That's not the opposite of value”

Andrew Ang · 39:17

“many stocks will have aspects of multiple factors within that same stock.”

Andrew Ang · 40:49
#growth#value#momentum#quality

Hot Take· 1

Hot Take45:27

Factor Indexes Are Active Decisions Delivered Transparently

Ang rejects a clean active-passive divide, arguing that even conventional indexes embed choices. Factor portfolios are explicitly active because they deviate from market-cap weights toward characteristics such as value, momentum, and quality, but they package those decisions transparently and at low cost.

  • Every index contains active design choices
  • Factor investing deliberately deviates from market-cap weights
  • Transparency distinguishes factor products from secret alpha processes
  • Broad, researched exposures should not command specialized-alpha fees

“everything is active and it's just a question of greater or lescent degree.”

Andrew Ang · 45:54

“factors are absolutely active.”

Andrew Ang · 46:35
#active management#passive investing#indexing#transparency

Explainer· 5

Explainer07:28

Factors Can Target Risk, Returns, and Specific Outcomes

Factors are not limited to producing market outperformance. Ang describes their use in diagnosing return drivers, enhancing returns through styles such as value and momentum, and targeting outcomes such as downside protection and portfolio resilience.

  • Factors reveal underlying return drivers
  • Style factors can seek enhanced returns
  • Minimum volatility can reduce downside exposure
  • Factor combinations can be tailored to desired outcomes

“I think factors should be used in all facets of the investment process.”

Andrew Ang · 07:44

“we can ask, what's the outcome you want to achieve.”

Andrew Ang · 08:20
#factor investing#risk management#portfolio outcomes
Explainer14:52

How Value and Other Factors Translate into Bonds

The concepts behind equity factors can be applied to fixed income, but their measurements must reflect bond economics. Bond value can compare price or yield with intrinsic measures such as forward curves or option-adjusted spreads, while term structure, carry, and international rate differences create additional applications.

  • Broad factors can appear across asset classes
  • Bond value uses yield or price relative to intrinsic value
  • Forward curves and option-adjusted spreads provide comparison points
  • The risk-free term structure supports curve, roll-down, and carry strategies

“value it's all about buying cheap relative to intrinsic right, what's intrinsic or fundamental value for a bond?”

Andrew Ang · 16:09

“we can apply the same concepts price or yield relative to a measure of intrinsic value.”

Andrew Ang · 16:30
#fixed income#bonds#value#yield curve
Explainer25:23

The Yield Curve's Level Matters Alongside Its Inversion

Ang says an inverted yield curve has consistently preceded economic slowdowns, though the historical record includes a false positive that still featured weaker growth. His research also found that the absolute level of interest rates contributes information, so a low curve and a negative spread should be considered together.

  • Inversions contain information about future activity
  • A slowdown followed the cited false-positive episode
  • Low interest-rate levels can also forecast slowdowns
  • Curve level and spread provide complementary signals

“The YU curve has a lot of information about future economic activity”

Andrew Ang · 26:17

“So it's not just the inversion, but inversion from a relatively low level also has a negative conta both the level.”

Andrew Ang · 27:11
#yield curve#recession#gdp#interest rates
Explainer42:36

How Minimum Volatility Seeks Market Returns with Less Risk

Ang's research found that the riskiest stocks had sharply lower returns rather than the higher returns simple theory might predict. A minimum-volatility portfolio can therefore target a market-like long-run return with reduced volatility, improving risk-adjusted results through a smaller denominator rather than a larger return numerator.

  • Very high-risk stocks showed sharply lower returns
  • Low-volatility portfolios can use low-beta and low-idiosyncratic-risk stocks
  • The objective is market-like return with reduced risk
  • Lower drawdowns may help investors remain invested

“the higher risk stocks have quote abysmally low returns unquote abysmally low.”

Andrew Ang · 43:25

“you form a portfolio of low volatility that gives you the same return over the long run as the market, but it does so with…”

Andrew Ang · 44:02
#minimum volatility#low beta#risk#drawdowns
Explainer47:08

Why Broad Factors Should Cost Less Than Specialized Alpha

Ang distinguishes broad, persistent, extensively researched factors from narrow alpha that depends on rare skills, proprietary data, fundamental expertise, or short-lived market dislocations. Investors may reasonably pay for scarce alpha, but established factor exposures should emphasize efficient implementation, transparency, and client control.

  • Factors are broad and persistently rewarded
  • Alpha can depend on specialized, scarce skill
  • Short-term dislocations may support genuine alpha
  • Well-known factor research should be delivered at lower cost

“Alpha is actually not broad and persistent, right requires specialized skills like the firms that you've talked about.”

Andrew Ang · 47:50

“When we find that school, we should pay up for it.”

Andrew Ang · 48:19
#alpha#fees#factor investing#asset management

Story· 3

Story03:50

What Really Drove Norway's Trillion-Dollar Portfolio

Ang's review of Norway's sovereign wealth fund found that a small number of broad factors explained much of the variation in returns despite tens of thousands of securities and many active managers. Norway subsequently made deliberate top-down factor allocations to improve its understanding of risk, return, and diversification.

  • The fund owned tens of thousands of securities
  • Macro and style factors explained much of active-return variation
  • Norway adopted direct, top-down factor allocations
  • The analysis connected academic factor research with institutional practice

“what mattered at the end of the day were these factors broad and persistent sources of returns.”

Andrew Ang · 04:36

“style factors like value and momentum quality, minimum volatility explain two thirds of the variation of these active returns”

Andrew Ang · 04:52
#norway#sovereign wealth#factor investing#portfolio risk
Story53:13

What Walt Disney Taught Andrew Ang About Innovation

Ang models his factor-investing mission on Walt Disney's ability to combine existing elements into a new system. The innovation is not necessarily inventing value, momentum, data, or technology individually, but integrating them into a better investment experience.

  • Innovation can come from integration rather than invention
  • Disney combined existing media and experiences into a new system
  • Factor investing similarly combines established insights
  • Data and technology can transform delivery and accessibility

“But what he did he brought all of those together and he just by integrating all that created something new.”

Andrew Ang · 53:45

“We didn't invent buying cheap right. We didn't invent momentum, but bring of those together with darn too technology, Yes, we can remake the world…”

Andrew Ang · 53:52
#innovation#walt disney#integration#technology
Story59:15

A Remedial Statistics Program Became a Lesson in Collaboration

After arriving at Stanford with strong undergraduate credentials, Ang struggled badly enough to consider withdrawing. Extra statistics courses ultimately produced his master's degree, while classmates helped him learn that difficult intellectual work could not always be completed alone.

  • Prior success produced overconfidence
  • Graduate school exposed gaps in preparation
  • Remedial coursework became a valuable additional degree
  • Peer support was essential to completing the program

“I did so badly. I thought about withdrawing.”

Andrew Ang · 59:38

“What did I learn is, um, you can't do it on your own.”

Andrew Ang · 1:00:19
#failure#graduate school#collaboration#learning

Takeaway· 3

Takeaway06:45

Why Moving from Investment Theory to Practice Is a People Problem

Ang argues that the deepest difference between academic research and implementation is not stale data or transaction-cost jargon. Practical change requires coordination across numerous teams before an idea can become a usable product on an advisor's shelf.

  • Academic work can be done largely in isolation
  • Real implementation crosses teams and functions
  • Organizational coordination is a core investment capability
  • A valid model does not implement itself

“the real difference between academic and practice is you've got to work with a lot of people to get these things to fruition.”

Andrew Ang · 07:02
#implementation#teamwork#asset management#organizations
Takeaway40:56

Why Momentum Backtests Often Beat Real Portfolios

Momentum strategies can require substantial turnover, making execution costs decisive. Whether momentum remains profitable in practice depends heavily on transaction-cost optimization and efficient trading rather than on the paper signal alone.

  • Momentum portfolios often have high turnover
  • Trading costs can erase theoretical returns
  • Execution quality separates viable strategies from failed implementations
  • Factor evaluation must include real-world operating details

“momentum has pretty high turnover”

Andrew Ang · 41:51

“The devil is always in the details.”

Andrew Ang · 42:31
#momentum#backtesting#transaction costs#execution
Takeaway1:02:42

The Hardest Investment Problems Often Aren't About Investing

Ang argues that portfolio mechanics may be easier than the surrounding human and institutional context. For institutions, management structure, governance, and incentives can dominate results; for individuals, behavior and the fit with family circumstances may matter more than technical optimization.

  • Institutional outcomes depend on governance and incentives
  • Individual outcomes depend heavily on behavior
  • Portfolio decisions must fit a wider personal or organizational structure
  • Technical investment selection may be the easier part

“the most important problems in investments are actually not about investing really.”

Andrew Ang · 1:02:51

“Sometimes the investment problem is the easy pot”

Andrew Ang · 1:03:18
#governance#incentives#behavioral finance#portfolio context