MMasters in Business
← All episodes
John Chisholm08 March 2019

Acadian’s John Chisholm Discusses Investments

5Frameworks
12Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 2

Myth Buster14:48

Factor ETFs Can Be Cheap Yet Inefficient

Low headline fees do not guarantee efficient factor exposure. Chisholm argues that mechanical rank-based rebalancing can force unnecessary purchases and sales, creating turnover and transaction costs that investors may not see directly.

  • Mechanical threshold rebalancing can generate avoidable turnover
  • A security need not be sold merely because its rank deteriorates slightly
  • Trading costs can reduce realized factor returns
  • Portfolio engineering matters alongside factor selection

“if you look at a typical factor e. T f UM, it's not built in a very efficient way.”

John Chisholm · 14:50

“there may be times when you want to hold onto something that's become less attractive because it might be expensive to trade out of it…”

John Chisholm · 15:15
#factor etfs#turnover#transaction costs#portfolio construction
Myth Buster48:42

Passive Investing Has Not Yet Broken Price Discovery

A fully passive market would lack a mechanism for setting prices, but active management does not need to control most assets for discovery to function. Chisholm says academic work suggests passive ownership can rise beyond current levels while preserving the market's price-discovery benefits.

  • A completely passive market would eliminate active price setting
  • Price discovery does not require most assets to be actively managed
  • Current passive levels are not yet presented as a distortion threshold
  • The relevant question is how much active capital is sufficient

“If you had a hundred percent of of every know, all assets were pastively managed, UM, you wouldn't have a mechanism of price discovery.”

John Chisholm · 48:58

“you can have a greater level of passive management than we have today and still get the you know, the social benefits if you will,…”

John Chisholm · 49:23
#passive investing#price discovery#market efficiency#indexing

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take47:23

Fee Compression Is Good for Investors and Hard on Managers

The migration of investment strategies into cheaper products pressures managers to operate efficiently and makes overpriced offerings less viable. Chisholm views the trend as a clear benefit for investors even though it compresses asset-management margins.

  • Investors should seek the least expensive route to a desired return stream
  • Pricing pressure forces operational efficiency
  • Overpriced products become harder to sustain
  • Asset managers face lower margins than in prior decades

“Investors should be looking for what's the if I want to get a certain return and risk stream, what's the least expensive way for me…”

John Chisholm · 47:51

“So great for investors, tougher for asset managers.”

John Chisholm · 48:24
#fees#asset management#etfs#competition
Hot Take57:48

Machine Learning Could Let Investors Go Broad and Deep

Traditional quantitative investors analyze many companies with limited depth, while fundamental investors study fewer companies intensively. Chisholm expects richer data and machine learning to narrow that divide, though overfitting remains a major obstacle and best practices are still developing.

  • Quants historically traded analytical depth for breadth
  • Fundamental investors traditionally achieved depth with limited coverage
  • Richer data may allow systematic analysis at both scales
  • Machine-learning complexity requires strong safeguards
  • Complex models do not automatically beat linear models

“I think we're at a point where we're gonna be able to start going broad and deep”

John Chisholm · 58:18

“Neural nets you know, can easily find the best fit to historic data UM, but not always guaranteed to outperform UM just a standard linear…”

John Chisholm · 58:42
#machine learning#big data#quant investing#fundamental analysis

Explainer· 2

Explainer06:20

Why Active Risk, Capacity, and Fees Must Be Traded Off

Chisholm distinguishes highly active strategies from enhanced indexing through tracking error and expected excess return. Lower-risk portfolios can absorb more capital but usually deliver less value added and command lower fees, making product design both an investment and business decision.

  • Greater active risk can support higher expected excess return
  • Lower tracking error generally increases capacity
  • Enhanced indexing sits closer to the benchmark
  • Client fee tolerance changes with expected value added

“typically the more money you manage, the harder is to add value.”

John Chisholm · 06:41

“you really have to trade off both from perspective of adding value and from perspective of running a business.”

John Chisholm · 06:56
#active management#tracking error#fees#capacity
Explainer43:37

How Growth Forecast Overconfidence Creates a Value Premium

Investors often extrapolate exceptional growth far beyond realistic horizons, paying prices that require decades of sustained expansion. Chisholm presents this overconfidence as one behavioral mechanism behind value investing, while acknowledging that several major internet companies sustained unusually strong growth longer than expected.

  • High valuations may require implausibly long growth periods
  • Investors often overestimate their ability to forecast future growth
  • Behavioral overconfidence can create opportunities for value strategies
  • Recent technology winners temporarily challenged the normal pattern

“investors typically are overconfident in their ability to predict future growth rates.”

John Chisholm · 44:04

“it's very hard to do that for twenty years”

John Chisholm · 44:41
#behavioral finance#value investing#growth stocks#overconfidence

Story· 2

Story02:33

How an Aspiring Rocket Scientist Became a Quant Investor

Chisholm studied aerospace engineering and joined Draper Laboratories to work on guidance systems while taking a part-time investment role with Gary Bergstrom. Testing both interests in parallel convinced him that finance was more compelling, eventually leading to Acadian's formation with Bergstrom and other partners.

  • Chisholm initially wanted to design spacecraft
  • Draper Laboratories provided experience with quantitative guidance systems
  • A part-time finance role let him test investing before changing careers
  • The early collaborators later became Acadian's co-founders

“When I went to college, my passion, what I was excited about, was really building or designing spaceships.”

John Chisholm · 02:33

“that made me decide that was more interesting than the aerospace stuff I was doing at the time.”

John Chisholm · 04:22
#career transition#aerospace#quant investing#acadian
Story59:16

The Leadership Review That Recalibrated Chisholm's Self-Image

During Acadian's CEO selection process, Chisholm compared his self-assessment with anonymous ratings from colleagues. The gap revealed that his confidence in his strategic and consensus-building abilities exceeded how others experienced aspects of his decision-making, creating a concrete development opportunity.

  • Leadership assessments compared self-ratings with colleague feedback
  • Anonymous input exposed blind spots in decision-making
  • Success can leave self-perception insufficiently tested
  • Accurate awareness of limitations is useful even when change is difficult

“really hearing other people's honest feedback is something that not everybody gets easily.”

John Chisholm · 1:00:41

“my self image was miscalibrated relative to where everybody else was.”

John Chisholm · 1:00:59
#leadership feedback#self-awareness#management#failure

Q&A· 1

Q&A1:01:33

Where New Graduates Can Still Find Opportunity in Finance

Quantitative asset management remains rewarding but is now a mature field with established firms and processes, making immediate impact harder. Chisholm identifies fintech as another promising path because retail investors remain underserved in advice and financial planning despite the spread of inexpensive funds.

  • Quant finance remains attractive for genuinely interested candidates
  • New entrants should expect impact to require more time and work
  • Established processes constrain greenfield experimentation
  • Fintech may improve retail advice and planning
  • Not every disruptive fintech concept will succeed

“it's going to take more work and it's gonna take some time.”

John Chisholm · 1:02:23

“they're still not served as well in terms of the sort of advice and planning portion as they potentially could be.”

John Chisholm · 1:02:48
#careers#quant finance#fintech#financial advice

Tool· 1

Tool28:46

When Satellite Data Is Actually Worth Buying

Alternative data can predict short-run business outcomes, but usefulness depends on portfolio relevance and infrastructure costs. Retail traffic imagery requires location mapping, rapid aggregation, sufficient coverage, and enough retailer exposure for the signal to materially affect results.

  • Alternative data is not automatically valuable
  • High-resolution frequent satellite coverage remains expensive
  • Operational infrastructure is required to aggregate observations
  • A useful forecast may still be immaterial to the total portfolio

“It's potentially valuable. Now, whether it's actually valuable to any individual in any particular investment firm depends on their style and their process.”

John Chisholm · 29:23

“If you only one percent of the portfolio have that you have invested in retailers, maybe it's not really going to move the needle that…”

John Chisholm · 30:13
#alternative data#satellite imagery#retail#data economics

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway24:34

Quant Investors Run on a Signal-Decay Treadmill

Established predictive characteristics tend to deliver smaller payoffs as markets evolve and investors arbitrage them. Chisholm says research teams must continually find new ideas to replace weakening ones, even though decay rates vary and some signals remain resilient.

  • Average signal payoffs tend to decline over time
  • Arbitrage and changing market conditions can erode inefficiencies
  • Not every factor decays at the same rate
  • Continuous research is necessary to preserve expected value added

“Typically the payoff to these characteristics decreases over time.”

John Chisholm · 25:05

“we're on a treadmill. We need to keep on finding new ideas to replace the old ideas that aren't working as well anymore.”

John Chisholm · 25:08
#signal decay#market efficiency#quant research#factors
Takeaway33:23

Do Not Become a Macro Tourist

Acadian does not attempt to forecast Federal Reserve decisions from speeches or policy interpretation because that is not its comparative advantage. It instead incorporates observable variables such as short-term rates, long-term rates, and the yield curve into quantitative models.

  • Investors should concentrate on the game they are equipped to play
  • Observable rate data can be useful without predicting the Fed
  • A model input is different from a discretionary macro forecast
  • Edge discipline prevents unsupported portfolio activity

“you need to play the game that you're good at”

John Chisholm · 33:48

“we're not trying to really forecast the direction of interest rates per se through FED statements or through other kinds of actions like that.”

John Chisholm · 34:20
#investment edge#macro forecasting#interest rates#quant models